| |
How much glyphosate resistance is
there?
There are
98 confirmed glyphosate resistant annual ryegrass (Lolium rigidum)
populations in Australia. Fourty-five of these populations have been
confirmed in broadacre cropping. Glyphosate resistance has now been
confirmed in two other weed species in Australia; awnless barnyard grass (Echinochloa
colona) and liverseed grass (Urochloa panicoides). Resistance in
both these weeds has occurred in summer chemical fallows in northern New
South Wales. For more details of the current status of glyphosate
resistance in Australia visit the Australian
Glyphosate Resistance Register.
What does glyphosate resistance look like?
In the
field, glyphosate resistant populations generally begin to appear as a
scattering of single plants or small patches of plants that have survived a
glyphosate application. Resistant plants are likely to initially show
typical glyphosate damage symptoms. Growth is affected for a few weeks
before the plants recover. Early control of these small patches is critical
to prevent resistant plants from setting seed.
What is the mechanism of glyphosate resistance?
We
now know of two mechanisms of glyphosate resistance in annual ryegrass
in Australia. Most of the resistant annual ryegrass populations are
the result of limited translocation of glyphosate within the plant. In
plants with this resistance mechanism, glyphosate preferentially
collects in the leaf tips, leaving much lower concentrations at the
growing points. These plants are therefore able to quickly grow away
from any glyphosate damage. The second mechanism is through mutations
within the EPSPS target site that allow a modest degree of resistance
to glyphosate. Plants with this mechanism are typically less resistant
to glyphosate than those with the translocation mechanism. They are
also more heavily damaged by glyphosate and show the effects for
longer. In annual ryegrass, it is possible to get both mechanisms in
the same plants. These plants are highly resistant to glyphosate.
I’m now using more glyphosate to manage weeds; have I got
resistance?
Changes in farming practices, like the adoption of reduced tillage
methods, often result in changes in the herbicide rate required to
achieve total weed control. This is also the case for knockdown
herbicides like glyphosate. The use of higher rates of knockdown
herbicides to achieve complete weed control does not infer herbicide
resistance or that resistance is beginning to occur. If resistance is
suspected, herbicide resistance testing can confirm any resistance
levels relative to known susceptible populations (see GSWG guide on
what to do if glyphosate resistance is suspected).
How quickly does glyphosate resistance develop?
Field experience and simulation modelling suggests that the likelihood
of glyphosate resistance developing can increase substantially after a
population has received approximately 15 years of glyphosate
applications. However, many field populations have received more
glyphosate applications and have not developed glyphosate resistance.
Clearly, there are several factors that can influence how quickly
glyphosate resistance will develop other than just the number of
herbicide applications. Most importantly for growers, management has a
major influence and there are several practices available that reduce
the risk of resistance developing and may extend the effective life of
the herbicide (see GSWG risk guide).
Can the use of other herbicides lead to glyphosate resistance?
There is no evidence that resistance to other herbicides confers
cross-resistance to glyphosate. That is, you can assume that only
glyphosate can select for glyphosate resistance.
Will using tank mixes reduce the chance of glyphosate resistance
developing?
To
be effective in reducing the risk of glyphosate resistance, the tank
mix partner must be fully compatible with glyphosate and must be
applied at a rate that will kill any glyphosate resistant plants in
the treated population.
Will using low rates of glyphosate increase the risk of glyphosate
resistance?
Herbicides should only be used at rates that consistently give high
kill. On average, using lower rates increases the chance of weeds
surviving the glyphosate application. The likely result is higher weed
numbers – a factor that can increase the risk of glyphosate
resistance. Therefore, the recommended product label rate should be
used.
Will using different types of glyphosate reduce my risk of
developing glyphosate resistance?
No
it won’t. The use of different brands of glyphosate or even other
salts of glyphosate will not reduce the risk of developing glyphosate
resistance. All glyphosate products, including all the various salts
and different formulations, are the same from a resistance management
point of view. They all have the same mode of action (EPSP synthase
inhibitors) and therefore are all GROUP M herbicides.
Will glyphosate resistance spread?
Resistance genes can potentially spread through either pollen or seed
movement. The great majority of ryegrass pollen is generally only
viable within 30m of the source plant. In the case of glyphosate
resistance, gene transfer through pollen has not been shown to be a
major factor. Weed seed can be moved between paddocks or farms by
livestock, machinery, crop seed, fodder, water and wind and care needs
to be taken to ensure that glyphosate resistance is not spread in this
way. Many known glyphosate resistant populations in Australia have not
rapidly increased in size, suggesting that resistance will not spread
quickly if identified early and managed well.
Will
glyphosate resistance in
weeds revert to susceptible?
Current evidence
suggests the frequency of glyphosate resistant individuals in a population
will decline with time if glyphosate is not used. However, it would take
many years of no glyphosate use for the proportion of resistant plants to
return to the very low levels needed for glyphosate to be effective on that
population again over repeated applications. Therefore, once a population is
resistant to glyphosate it should be assumed that glyphosate will not be a
fully effective control option for that population again. As a result,
rotations of herbicides that give glyphosate a rest in some years can be
very valuable in reducing the risk of glyphosate resistance. It is likely
that glyphosate will continue to be used to control other susceptible weed
species in the paddock even after resistance in one species has developed.
There will be no decrease of glyphosate resistance if there is continued
selection pressure.
Will using the double knock lower the risk of glyphosate resistant
weeds?
Yes, but
only when used correctly. The double knock of glyphosate followed by
application of a paraquat-based product relies on both herbicides being
applied at rates appropriate for the weed species being targeted. The
strategy relies on control of the rare glyphosate resistant survivors by the
paraquat. The glyphosate survivors are not likely to be controlled by low
rates of paraquat. Similarly, large weeds are unlikely to be controlled by
paraquat.
Can tillage lower the risk of glyphosate resistant
weeds?
Yes, but only if the rare glyphosate resistant survivors are killed by the
cultivation. For this to happen, the cultivation needs to be well timed and
executed. For example, by acting as a double knock, full-cut cultivation at
seeding following a knockdown glyphosate application will considerably
reduce the chance of any rare glyphosate resistant plants surviving and
therefore reduce the risk of glyphosate resistance.
Will spraytopping or croptopping with glyphosate be effective on
glyphosate resistant plants?
No.
Research has shown that seeds will remain viable if glyphosate is applied as
a spraytop or croptop to glyphosate resistant annual ryegrass. Spraytopping
or croptopping with glyphosate should not be undertaken on populations known
or suspected to be resistant to glyphosate and an alternative mode of action
herbicide should be used.
Will inter-row application of glyphosate increase the risk of
resistance?
Although glyphosate resistance is rare, the use of glyphosate in-crop, such
as in shielded interrow spraying, can increase the risk of resistance
developing. This is because the use of glyphosate in-crop can expose a
greater percentage of a weed population to the herbicide, with limited
opportunities for resistant survivors to be controlled before they set seed.
The use of inter-row spraying, where registered (e.g. for specific uses in
cotton), should be used in conjunction with integrated weed management
strategies.
Is paraquat resistance possible?
Yes.
Paraquat and diquat resistance has been confirmed in many barley grass (Hordeum
spp.) populations in Australia (see www.weedscience.org). These have
mainly come from very intensive paraquat and diquat use in lucerne and some
from no-till cropping. Paraquat resistant capeweed and silver grass
populations have also been confirmed. There are no confirmed paraquat
resistant ryegrass populations in Australia, although paraquat resistant
annual ryegrass has been confirmed in vineyards in South Africa.
|
|
Will the use of low rates of paraquat increase the risk of paraquat or
glyphosate resistance?
Yes.
Herbicides should only be used at rates that consistently give high levels
of weed control. On average, using lower rates increases the chance of weeds
surviving the paraquat application. The likely result is higher weed numbers
– a factor that can increase the risk of paraquat or glyphosate resistance.
Also studies have indicated that paraquat resistance can develop more
quickly if lower rates (less than 1L/ha of paraquat) are routinely used on
outcrossing weed species like annual ryegrass. This is caused by the pattern
of inheritance of paraquat resistance in annual ryegrass. Therefore, the
recommended product label rate for the purpose should always be used.
Clethodim - aka Select® (MOA Group A) resistance and glyphosate resistance –
is there a link?
Currently, three populations of glyphosate resistant annual ryegrass in
northern NSW also have low levels of resistance to clethodim (Group A).
This is the result of the recent intensive use of clethodim, often
tank-mixed with glyphosate, to control glyphosate resistant annual ryegrass
prior to planting a winter crop. Prior to becoming glyphosate resistant,
these populations previously had some exposure to Group A herbicides.
This use of Group A
herbicides in fallow is not registered or ‘permitted’. There are no crop
plant back periods established for cereals and severe crop damage has been
recorded following this practice.
There is no known cross
resistance occurring between Groups A and M, resistance to the two groups is
selected separately. In southern farming systems Group A resistance in
annual ryegrass populations is common, while resistance to glyphosate
remains quite rare.
The development of
clethodim resistance in glyphosate resistant annual ryegrass effectively
removes Group A herbicides as a glyphosate resistance management tool for
grass weeds in winter crops. Clethodim should not be relied on as the only
management strategy for glyphosate resistant annual ryegrass. Instead
integrated weed management and a policy of preventing seed set from any weed
survivors should be used.
What do I do if I
suspect glyphosate resistance?
When
glyphosate resistance is first suspected we advise that growers contact
their local agronomist. The following steps are then recommended:
1
Consider the possibility of other common causes of herbicide failure by
asking:
>
Was
the glyphosate applied in conditions and at a rate that should kill the
target weed?
>
Did
the suspect plants avoid herbicide contact or emerge after the glyphosate
application?
>
Does
the pattern of surviving plants suggest a spray miss or other application
problem? If resistance is still suspected:
2
Contact one of the following members of the national Glyphosate
Sustainability Working Group for advice on sampling suspect plants for
testing and confirmation of the resistance status:
South
Australia:
Chris
Preston, University of Adelaide:
Phone: 08
8303 7237 Fax: 08 8303 7109
Email: christopher.preston@adelaide.edu.au
New South
Wales:
Southern:
John Broster, Charles Sturt University:
Phone: 02
6933 4001 Fax: 02 6933 2924
Email: jbroster@csu.edu.au
Northern:
Tony Cook, NSW Department of Primary Industries:
Phone: 02
67631250 Fax: 02 6763 1222
Email: tony.cook@industry.nsw.gov.au
Victoria
and Tasmania:
Chris
Preston, University of Adelaide:
Phone: 08
8303 7237 Fax: 8303 7109
Email: christopher.preston@adelaide.edu.au
Queensland:
Michael
Widderick, Queensland DPI&F:
Phone: 07
4639 8856 Fax: 07 4639 8800
Email: michael.widderick@deedi.qld.gov.au
Western
Australia:
Steve
Powles, WAHRI, University of WA:
Phone: 08
6488 7870 Fax: 08 6488 7834
Email: spowles@plants.uwa.edu.au
Abul
Hashem, Department of Agriculture and Food Western Australia:
Phone: 08
9690 2000 Fax: 08 9622 1902
Email: ahashem@agric.wa.gov.au
3
Ensure suspect plants do not set any seed.
4
If
resistance is confirmed, develop a management plan for future years in
consultation with an agronomist.
What
can increase the risk of glyphosate resistance in weeds?
There are
a number of predisposing risk factors for glyphosate resistance. Practices
that may increase the risk of glyphosate resistance in weeds include:
>
Frequent glyphosate based chemical fallow
>
Continuous reliance on glyphosate pre-seeding
>
Lack
of tillage
>
Lack
of effective in-crop weed control
>
Inter-row glyphosate use
>
Frequent crop-topping with glyphosate
>
High
weed numbers
For a guide to managing glyphosate resistance risks visit:
[Add new link here]
What
can reduce the risk of glyphosate resistance in weeds?
Practices
that may be used to decrease the risk of glyphosate resistance in weeds
include:
>
The
double knock technique*
>
Strategic use of alternative knockdown groups
>
Full-cut cultivation at sowing
>
Effective in-crop weed control
>
Use
alternative herbicide groups or tillage for inter- row and fallow weed
control
>
Non-herbicide practices for weed seed kill
>
Crop-topping with alternative herbicide groups
>
Farm
hygiene to prevent resistant seed movement
For a
guide to managing glyphosate resistance risks visit:
[Add new link here]
* The
double knock technique is defined as using a full cut cultivation OR the
full label rate of a paraquat-based product
(Herbicide Group L) following the glyphosate (Herbicide Group M) knockdown
application.
Has
flaxleaf fleabane developed resistance to glyphosate?
An
extensive random survey of flaxleaf fleabane in southern Queensland and
northern NSW showed that populations differed in their response to
glyphosate when grown under the same conditions. Notably, all populations
from cropping paddocks in southern Queensland and most from cropping
paddocks in NSW required a significantly higher glyphosate dose (3 to 6-fold
higher) for similar control than populations from non-cropping situations
remote to cropping areas. It is highly likely that these cropping paddocks
had a history of glyphosate use for fallow weed control. In contrast, the
non-cropping situations were not likely to have been treated as extensively
with glyphosate.
This survey
provides a strong indication that flaxleaf fleabane populations, that have
been repeatedly sprayed with glyphosate, are less susceptible than those
that have not been repeatedly sprayed. Populations from limited sampling in
South Australia and West Australia, which have not had as long a history of
treatment with glyphosate as the northern NSW and QLD crop paddock
populations, responded the same as those from non-cropping situations in
southern Queensland.
This weed has
been classed as resistant to glyphosate in several countries overseas.
However, this weed has generally been considered difficult to control in
Australia with glyphosate alone. It is also not on Australian glyphosate
labels, so technically it can’t be classified as resistant to glyphosate in
this country.
The increased
tolerance to glyphosate present in fleabane populations from crop paddocks
in northern NSW and southern Qld means glyphosate alone will not control
this weed. A double knock strategy or alternative knockdown herbicides
should be employed.
|